🔗 Share this article

The England team was eliminated of a World Cup after losing a match they were heavily favored in, thanks to a surprise performance which nobody saw coming. Sound familiar? This is because it applies to two events involving England which took place almost exactly a year apart: on Wednesday, their 50-over semi-final exit at the hands of South Africa; a year ago, their loss in a crucial group stage match against West Indies in the 20-over version.

The Interim Period

In the interim, there was a whitewash in the Ashes and a thorough analysis which was intended to overhaul the system. Did it? Time to delve a little more closely into those two World Cup eliminations. In 2024, England collapsed, dropped five catches, and allowed a aggressive batting display from Qiana Joseph to win the day. In the latest match, a player with superb skill and composure – the South Africa captain, Laura Wolvaardt – demonstrated why she is among the elite in cricket. She gave precisely one chance – a catch to Alice Capsey at long-on – and England held on to it. The trouble was, she had already scored 169 runs by that point.

‘It’s painful’: The coach turns to next generation after England’s World Cup defeat.

It probably won’t bring the England head coach, Charlotte Edwards, much comfort as she returns from her first World Cup as manager – she is a performance-focused leader, and a loss is a loss. But she has already made a difference. From the low point of multiple fielding errors in a single day of Test cricket in Melbourne, six months later England secured more chances this World Cup than any other team. That is something.

England’s Innings Struggles

The problem was what came after Wolvaardt’s knock. Was there anyone inside that England dressing room truly confident they were able to reach a total of more than 300? Certainly no one outside it did. England’s rapid decline to 0/2 and 1/3 sparked a reaction not of horror but of weary inevitability.

“We do need to enhance our batting performance – I don’t think it’s been reliable at times,” Edwards said after the match. Therein lies the concern. There have been eight totals of more than 300 in this tournament: a portion were hit by Australia, three by India, and two by South Africa. This is now standard in women’s ODI cricket: in order to rival the world’s best, England need a batting order which can realistically aim to surpass 300 runs. But when nobody except Nat Sciver-Brunt and Heather Knight has a history of consistently scoring meaningful runs, well, you do the maths.

Collaborative Innings

Capsey’s 105-run partnership with Sciver-Brunt in the semi-final had some value – Capsey demonstrated that she can play responsibly, at least for 70 balls – but it was never going to be enough to win the game. Compare and contrast with South Africa, who were able to add 117 runs from their last 10 overs, exceeding the magic 300, because Wolvaardt had confidence in the batters following her and felt she had enough freedom to hit out. “Knowing what we still had in the sheds with the last 10 coming up, I thought I’d better have a swing,” she told Sky Sports.

Heather Knight and Nat Sciver-Brunt were the only England batters to deliver regularly during the tournament.

Coaching Dilemmas

When Edwards was hired in April, her dilemma was whether to stick or twist: she opted to give an veteran team who had struggled previously one last shot at World Cup glory. She got it wrong. England come back with the least favorable outcome: without a trophy, and with little basis on which to restructure over the next four years. The majority of the top order from the semi-final are unlikely to play in another 50-over World Cup.

A change of approach is now approaching, as Edwards herself signalled. “This is the end of an ODI cycle,” she said. “We’ve got to look at the future now.”

Upcoming Talent

It’s about time: an opportunity to evaluate at the young left-hander Grace Scrivens, the 20-year-old wicketkeeper Seren Smale and the teenage spinner Tilly Corteen-Coleman.

The nagging worry is that it might already be too late: England’s latest round of central contracts were finalized on 1 October. The cricket board has not yet released a full list of contracted players, but it isn’t difficult to work out that the current World Cup squad are the main beneficiaries.

Moving Forward

Stagnation and complacency were the dual enemies on which the Ashes whitewash was built – time for Edwards to signal that she is committed to preventing their return.